8.
a
respects is given, but nevertheless by the help of some special pleasing liable to the objection that it does not absolutely declare no
torturo- legal after sentence.
W
otherwise will be
inflicted
In the meantime Mr. Mitchell,
barrister, had wailed on me and stated
that he was er
employed by the Prisoner
and had evidence to prove an alibi
for the latter. I thereupon ordered as
rehearing of
the case but too o
of
the
witnesses examined at the first hearing
had returned home and My Mitchell
objected that the prisoner
Criss-
Escamino
examined.
Wl3
entitled to
every witness already
vider Ny
14
14
May, 1866
18.
May,
1816
15
را به
No q
15 May.
May, 1886.
No 10.
9.
In that opinion the Acting
335
Attorney General Concurred, adding
that he saw no reason
why the magistrates
should not exercise their discretion as to
bail in the case.
10.
The Magistrates showever both
May. 1866 felt they could not accept bail. in a
17 May, 1866
case where the evidence was so clear and clear-and
it was not till the 30th May that all
got: together agains
the lactresses envied he for the purpose of being subjected to cross Ixamination by the Prisoner's Counsel.
In the meantime I had directed
communication to be made to the Consul
informing him that I had permitted a
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.